2011年8月27日 星期六

不絕於耳的喇叭聲-厄瓜多


文章日期:2011-08-27 07:48


窗外的喇叭聲不絕於耳,夾雜著警鈴聲
彷彿回到小時候的臺灣
上次聽到這麼熱鬧的聲音,應該是在越南河內
這回,路上人們口裡講的是聽不懂的西班牙語!

中午,拿著相機出旅館,想說借最後一個中午的太陽留下些紀念
電梯裡遇到Barry and Warren
看到我的裝扮,只說了句,要小心些!
有哪些地方連中午出門都要小心呢?
海濱的遊憩區頗為現代化,與淡水第二漁港相比有過之而無不及
乾淨到令人吃驚


公園一邊都是鐵柵欄,警察的頻率超高,各個出口都有
百思不得其解何以公園有這麼多柵欄?
後來想想,可能是讓宵小不敢斗膽犯案,如果犯案,要跑一段路才有出口
要翻牆也麻煩,勸他們就此打消念頭。
人雖多,還是有點膽戰心驚,特別是看到路邊連影印店都有鐵柵欄圍著

這邊上應該是法院,門口一堆影印店,想是要印狀子的吧!

前兩天晚上為了照相還獨自出門去逛公園,
現在回想,還真是膽子太大了些

回頭去逛旅館門口的公園總是比較安全
路上不時看到勾肩搭背或手牽手的男女
不然就是帶著小孩的婦女,我想她們應該沒有出生率過低的問題

公園裡滿是綠鬣蜥,就在你周圍跑來跑去、爭奪地盤

很難想像,在台灣動物園才看到的動物
這裡滿公園都是,跟鴿子比賽跑、搶食物,或者在樹上各據一方曬太陽

倒是孩子們樂得開心,不用花錢上動物園,可以餵鴿子、鬥綠鬣蜥,水池裡還有龜呢!
公園裡也有很多警衛,不知是要阻止大家隨便餵食綠鬣蜥,還是擔心有人把鴿子獵回家當食物了


這裡最聞名的,應該是作為千里之外的加拉巴哥群島往返之"航道",
一度想去朝聖,只是諸多情感因素,還是照時程儘快回家,
二度與加拉巴哥群島擦身而過,只能說無緣啦!
等Handsome退休有錢有閒再來啦!

這是哪裡?是個以前沒聽過,也不會想要來的地方,連名稱都很奇怪
厄瓜多  惠夜基 Ecuador,  Guayaquil
凌晨抵達,清晨離開,五天下來,啥也沒能買,也算是創記錄。

每日一字


文章日期:2011-08-27 08:23
每天能夠學到新字都是很開心的事
前陣子跟印尼學生學了個新字
Fasting Month, 還誤以為跟快速有啥關係,其實是齋戒月的意思。
讓Handsome笑我孤陋寡聞
昨天,跟SONIC MSN,他提到本來要去爬山,結果雨下不停,只好取消計畫,
突然間冒出個
TOT
我說,啥是TOT啊?
他回說,很悲傷,悲傷到一直哭個不停
聽了這回答
還真是讓人覺得TOT了

2011年8月1日 星期一

2011臺灣北部沿近海延繩釣漁業之產能與經營效益評估


Capacity and Economic Efficiency of Coastal and Offshore Longline Fisheries of Northern Taiwan


臺灣沿近海漁船筏約22千餘艘,近十年漁船數與馬力數增加了5.6%19%,而漁獲產量卻減少27%。其中延繩釣船數占沿近海總船數45%,臺北縣與基隆市延繩釣漁船占9%,屬於重要漁業種類之一,本研究欲了解延繩釣漁戶的經營效率、漁船產能狀況,以提供管理建議。調查時間自20097月至20101月,在臺北縣與基隆市主要漁港以問卷蒐集漁船資料。結果總計調查39艘延繩釣漁船,87%為專營漁業,船長平均年資30年,全年平均作業天數157天,單船漁獲量約12.9公噸,主要魚種為紅目鰱及赤鯮,占總漁獲量約47%。經濟指標方面,平均毛利約2,920千元,平均淨利約1515千元,投入成本主要為油料費及工資,兩者各占27%,漁獲處理費用18%,平均每船財務盈餘為676千元,較多20~50噸級漁船有虧損情形。資料包絡法 (Data Envelopment Analysis, DEA)分析結果顯示,79%漁船處於規模報酬遞減,產能利用率平均在0.8以上,10噸以下漁船最具技術效率。效率分群比較發現,油料費及漁獲量為造成效率差異的主因,造成漁獲量差異月份為2月、11月及12月,作業時段從晚上至白天的漁船有較好的漁獲量。最後以Tobit迴歸判斷影響效率及產能利用率因子發現,技術效率主要受作業地點及作業時段影響,在彭佳嶼附近作業對於技術效率具正面影響,產能利用率與船長的年資有顯著正相關。作業漁船成本調整,10~20噸效率低漁船,平均每船應減少餌料成本7%20~50噸效率低漁船,平均每船應減少油料費20%及餌料費11%。政府減船收購對象可針對經營虧損、規模報酬遞減、技術效率低及產能利用率高的漁船。
 The number of total coastal and offshore fishing vessels was around 22000. The number and horsepower increased 5.6% and 19% in the recent ten years, respectively. However, the catches decreased around 27%. Among those fisheries, longline vessels was around 45% in number, which Taipei county and Keelung city were 9% of total longline vessels. The object of this research is to study the operational efficiency of those longline fishing vessels and provide management suggestions. The data was collected from July 2009 to January 2010 by questionnaire. The study collected data from 39 longline fishing vessels, which 87% fisherman were full-time fishermen. The average experience was 30 years. The total fishing days was 157 days and the catch per vessels was 12.9. The target species were Priacanthus macracanthus and Dentex tumifrons, were 47% of total catch in weight. Regarding the economic perforence, gross revenue and net revenue were around NT$ 2.9 million and NT$1.5 million. Fuel and crews were the main costs stand for 27% respectively. Bait was 18% among total costs. Financial profit was about NT$676 thousand in average. More fishing vessels between 20 to 50 have loss. Through data envelopment analysis, 79% vessels were decreased return to scale (DRS), average Capacity Utilization were larger than 0.8. Vessels less than 10 Gross tonnages had better efficiency. Fuel and catches were the main factors. In addition, catches in February, November and December were significant different between high efficiency and low efficiency groups. Vessel which working shift from night to day with more catches than at other working times. According to tobit regression, fishing ground and fishing time were the main factor to TE, a positive correlation between CU and captain’s experience. However, for those low efficiency vessels, which the tonnage between 10 to 20 should reduce 7% bait costs in average. Those vessels tonnage between 20 to 50 should reduce 20%fuel and 11% bait costs. In vessel buyback program, government could consider to buyback those fishing vessels which operate loss, DRS, with low TE and high CU ones.
  

2011臺灣民眾海洋意識之探討

這篇文章2013年刊在  Coastal Management

2011臺灣民眾海洋意識之探討

 Public Ocean Awareness in Taiwan

研究生游美慧 Mei-hui You

臺灣是個海島國家,過去受傳統大陸型思維模式影響,忽略環海的資源與優勢。近年來因應國際社會對海洋資源開發與保育的日益重視,我國政府開始以海洋為主軸,積極推展海洋政策,包括加強海洋教育,以帶動各項發展,落實「海洋興國」的目標。本研究旨在瞭解臺灣民眾對海洋環境的認識,並分析民眾對於海洋相關政策與議題的看法。研究對象為全臺灣(含離島)年滿20歲以上民眾,依據縣市人口比例採分層隨機抽樣,依據對海洋治理的態度、海洋環境保護的認知、海洋資源的保育及利用、海洋休閒與遊憩等四大議題設計問卷,調查於201010月至12月進行,利用電話成功完訪1120人,其中男性513人(45.8%),女性607人(54.2%),教育程度中以大學/專比例最高340(34.8%),並對性別、年齡及教育程度進行事後分層加權。結果顯示民眾對海洋國家公園、海洋事務推行委員會、中華白海豚保護活動、海岸清潔及漁業管理等政策了解的比例不到20%。關於海洋環境保護之公共事務,超過6成的民眾對氣候暖化、漏油污染、珊瑚白化等環境議題上有普遍的認識,對禁止捕捉豆腐鯊和限制捕捉黑鮪有將近7成表示支持及認同,代表民眾日益重視海洋資源與環境的保育。有關海洋資源利用,48.4%民眾每週食用海鮮等魚類三次以上,其頻率相當高,但將近8成對於海鮮食品產銷履歷和生態標章並不熟悉。在海洋休閒與遊憩中,全臺42.2%的民眾會游泳,且男性會游泳比例高於女性。在海洋和水上遊憩活動、離島旅遊方面,有超過3成民眾較少參與,顯示民眾參與度仍有限,可再加強推展海洋休閒遊憩的活動及種類。本研究結果係首次針對臺灣民眾海洋整體議題的了解進行全面性調查。建議政府可透過新聞媒體中提昇民眾對海洋議題的認識及海洋生態資源的環保意識,同時向下扎根積極推展海洋教育,建立全民的海洋意識,以利臺灣整體海洋政策的推展。
 Taiwan is an island country. In the past, we ignored the resources and the advantages of the surrounding sea because of the traditional ideological mode of mainland. In recent years, because of the increasing attention on protection and conservation on marine resources of international society, Taiwanese government has adopted many marine policies, including strength of marine education, to implement the goal that ocean makes the country prosperous. The main objectives of this study are to investigate the public awareness of marine environment in Taiwan and analyze the perspectives related to marine issues. The samplings are stratified by county on the adult population who are 20-years old in Taiwan (including off-shore islands). The questionnaire was designed in accordance with the awareness of marine governance, marine environment and resources protection, marine resource care and use, and access to the sea and ocean recreational activity. The surveys had completed 1120 telephone interviewees (45.8% male and 54.2% female) during October to December in 2010. Regarding the education, the college graduates has highest percentage of 34.8%. Post-stratification weighting are conducted based on gender, age level and education level. The results showed less than 20% of the public had the knowledge of related policies such as marine national park, coastal cleaning, fishery industry management and etc. The public had higher recognition (66.3%) on marine protection issues such as global warming, oil leak pollution, oceanic garbage. In addition, more than 78.2% express support in prohibiting whale shark fishing and setting up bluefin tuna fishing limits. It means the public take the marine resource and the environment grdadually. Regarding the use of marine resources, 48.4% ate seafood or fishes 3 times a week. However, almost 80% were not familiar with traceability system and eco-label. Regarding the access to the sea capability, 42.2% of the public are capable of swimming; the percentage of male was higher than female. There were around 30% people did not participate on marine recreational activities. It showed there are space for outreach and promotion. This study is the first full survey on the public awareness of marine issues. It is suggested the government could introduce more ocean issues and conservation concept through media. In addition, conduct more ocean education, build public ocean awareness will be positive on the development of marine education and marine policy decision-making.